Case Studies Exposed
Written during the peak of the fiasco, I wanted to re-share. It’s as true in 2022 as the day I wrote it back in 2020.
As we read over the guidelines from the CDC, studies and reports, we must pay careful attention to the words used as they transform the meaning.
In this report, we’ll cover CDC documents and cited articles used to drive policy across our nation and the world. If some of the statement seem redundant, it’s to re-iterate the fact, they lied to push BigPharma agenda.
Let's start as we read a few quotes from the CDC. The page in question, "Evidence for Effectiveness of Cloth Face Coverings."
Pay close attention to the words used throughout. The CDC states in their summary section,
"CDC recommends that people wear cloth face coverings in public settings and when around people who don't live in your household, especially when other social distancing measures are difficult to maintain."
Notice the keyword. They recommend “people wear.” It doesn't mention require.
"Cloth face coverings may help prevent people who have COVID-19 from spreading the virus to others."
The term used, may in conjunction with help. It implies they're not sure if a cloth cover prevents the spread of a virus or not.
It may, or it may not. They continue,
"Cloth face coverings are most likely to reduce the spread of COVID-19 when they are widely used by people in public settings."
Another word of interest, "likely." Ambiguous terms to cover liability. The CDC and others know these masks offer little in the reduction of viral spread. Hence the careful selection of words. “Likely” to reduce, it doesn't suggest it will.
Next, they make two claims about who should not wear a mask.
Children under two.
Those who have issues with breathing.
"Cloth face coverings should not be worn by children under the age of 2 or anyone who has trouble breathing..."
By keeping the terms subjective, it gives latitude. They can change policy on a whim without notice or accountability. Next, they'll attempt to explain who spreads a viral infection.
"COVID-19 can be spread by people who do not have symptoms and do not know that they are infected."
By using the word can, it provides them power to make policy as they see fit. To demonstrate this point, an article dated June 8th from CNBC,
"WHO officials now say that while asymptomatic spread can occur, it is not the main way it's being transmitted."
The word "can". It allows them to shift the narrative. They know it's not transmitted by a person who shows no signs. With a cold (coronavirus), the infected person almost always shows sign of sickness.
Fever (usually low-grade in adults but higher in children)
This, however, is nothing more than a psychological play to force compliance.
"From the data we have, it still seems to be rare that an asymptomatic person actually transmits onward to a secondary individual, ... It's very rare. … We have a number of reports from countries who are doing very detailed contact tracing, ... They're following asymptomatic cases. They're following contacts. And they're not finding secondary transmission onward. It's very rare."
— Dr. Maria Van Kerkhove, head of WHO's emerging diseases and zoonosis unit. Spoken at a United Nations agency's Geneva headquarters briefing.
At the time of this writing, there has been no asymptomatic spread of Covid.
By using subjective terms it allows the CDC to confuse and offer elbow room for illegal policy enforcement. And it's our ignorance, lack of our own research, these tyrants bank on. If people investigated a little, the mask nonsense would’ve ended before it started.
And they continue,
"People should not wear cloth face coverings while engaged in activities that may cause the cloth face covering to become wet."
Common sense 101, yet people exercise with masks on as they dripped in sweat. It's a lung infection waiting to happen.
"People who are engaged in high intensity activities, like running, may not be able to wear a cloth face covering if it causes difficulty breathing."
They also cause issue with breathing, even when not engaged in intense physical activities.
"People who work in a setting where cloth face coverings may increase the risk of heat-related illness or cause safety concerns due to introduction of a hazard (for instance, straps getting caught in machinery)"
The full report is available to paying subscribers in PDF or e-pub. As a subscriber you have access to all past and future reports and e-books. (Thank you so much for supporting my work!)
View Available e-Books & Reports. Check back often, new releases added.
Keep reading with a 7-day free trial
Subscribe to WIV Reports — Uncensored to keep reading this post and get 7 days of free access to the full post archives.